Choosing between Zapier vs Make can feel like picking between two supercharged engines—both powerful, but built for different journeys. In this deep dive, we’ll dissect every angle to help you pick the perfect automation tool for your needs.
Zapier vs Make: Overview and Core Philosophy
When comparing Zapier vs Make, it’s essential to start with their foundational goals and design philosophies. Both platforms aim to simplify workflow automation, but they approach the challenge from different angles, targeting slightly different user bases and use cases.
What Is Zapier?
Zapier, launched in 2011, has become synonymous with no-code automation. It allows users to create ‘Zaps’—automated workflows that connect apps and trigger actions based on specific events. For example, when a new email arrives in Gmail, Zapier can automatically create a task in Trello.
- Over 5,000 app integrations available
- User-friendly interface ideal for beginners
- Focus on simplicity and speed in setup
Zapier’s philosophy revolves around accessibility. It’s designed for non-technical users who want to automate repetitive tasks without writing a single line of code. Its drag-and-drop builder and pre-built templates make it one of the most approachable tools in the automation space. Learn more about Zapier’s capabilities at zapier.com.
What Is Make (Formerly Integromat)?
Make, previously known as Integromat, rebranded in 2022 to reflect its evolution into a more visual and intuitive platform. While it also enables app-to-app automation, Make emphasizes flexibility and complex logic handling through a visual scenario builder.
- Visual workflow builder with modular components
- Advanced data manipulation and routing options
- Built for power users and developers
Unlike Zapier’s linear ‘if this, then that’ model, Make uses a node-based system where data flows through interconnected modules. This allows for branching logic, loops, and parallel processing—features that are harder to achieve in Zapier. Explore Make’s platform at make.com.
“Make is like LEGO for automation—modular, flexible, and capable of building complex structures.” — Automation Expert, TechCrunch
Zapier vs Make: Interface and User Experience
The user interface is often the deciding factor for many teams when choosing between Zapier vs Make. While both platforms offer visual builders, their design philosophies lead to vastly different user experiences.
Zapier’s Linear and Guided Approach
Zapier uses a step-by-step wizard to guide users through the automation creation process. Each ‘Zap’ follows a trigger-action model: one event triggers a series of actions across connected apps.
- Simple onboarding with tooltips and suggestions
- Limited room for error due to guided flow
- Best for users who want quick, reliable automations
This approach reduces cognitive load, making it ideal for marketers, sales teams, or small business owners who need fast results. However, the simplicity comes at a cost—limited control over data flow and conditional logic.
Make’s Visual Scenario Builder
Make’s interface is more akin to a digital canvas. Users drag and drop modules (representing apps, functions, or logic) and connect them with lines to define data flow. This visual approach allows for complex workflows with multiple branches, filters, and data transformations.
- Real-time data preview at each step
- Support for loops, routers, and aggregators
- Steeper learning curve but greater long-term flexibility
For example, you can set up a scenario where incoming leads are split based on location, enriched with external data, and routed to different CRMs—all within a single workflow. This level of control is unmatched in Zapier’s standard interface.
“Make’s visual editor feels like programming without code—empowering and precise.” — Product Manager, SaaS Startup
Zapier vs Make: Automation Capabilities and Flexibility
When evaluating Zapier vs Make, automation depth is a critical differentiator. While both platforms can handle basic tasks, their ability to manage complexity varies significantly.
Basic Automations: Who Does It Better?
For simple, linear automations—like syncing new form submissions to a Google Sheet—Zapier excels. Its pre-built templates and one-click integrations make setup almost instantaneous.
- Thousands of pre-made Zaps available
- One-click activation for common workflows
- Fast deployment with minimal configuration
Make can perform the same tasks, but it requires more manual setup. There’s no ‘quick add’ button; instead, you build each step from scratch. This can be a downside for users seeking instant solutions.
Advanced Workflows: Where Make Shines
When workflows require conditional logic, data transformation, or multi-step processing, Make pulls ahead. Its support for routers, filters, and iterators allows for sophisticated automation logic.
- Handle multiple outcomes from a single trigger
- Process data in batches or loops
- Integrate custom scripts via HTTP or code modules
For instance, you can create a Make scenario that processes 100 incoming orders, checks inventory levels, sends backorders to a separate queue, and notifies customers—all in one automated flow. Zapier would require multiple Zaps and potentially premium features to achieve the same result.
Zapier vs Make: Integration Ecosystem and App Support
The number and quality of app integrations are crucial when comparing Zapier vs Make. Both platforms support a wide range of tools, but their coverage and depth differ.
Zapier’s Breadth of Integrations
Zapier leads in the number of supported apps, with over 5,000 integrations. This includes popular tools like Slack, Salesforce, Shopify, and Notion.
- Extensive library of pre-built app connections
- Frequent updates and new app additions
- Strong support for niche and emerging SaaS tools
This breadth makes Zapier a go-to choice for teams using less common apps. If your tool isn’t directly supported, Zapier’s Webhooks by Zapier can often bridge the gap.
Make’s Depth Over Breadth
Make supports around 1,000 apps—fewer than Zapier—but often provides deeper functionality within those integrations. For example, Make’s Google Sheets module allows for complex queries and batch operations, while Zapier’s is more limited to basic row additions.
- More granular control over API calls
- Better handling of authentication and pagination
- Support for advanced features like file processing and web scraping
Additionally, Make’s HTTP module enables direct API access, allowing users to integrate virtually any service with a REST API. This makes it a favorite among developers and technical teams.
“With Make, I’ve automated internal tools that don’t even have official integrations.” — CTO, Mid-Sized Tech Firm
Zapier vs Make: Pricing and Value Comparison
Pricing is a major factor in the Zapier vs Make debate. Both platforms use tiered models, but their structures reflect their target audiences.
Zapier’s Tiered Pricing Model
Zapier’s pricing is based on the number of tasks (actions) performed per month and the number of Zaps active. The free plan allows 100 tasks/month and 5 Zaps, which is great for testing.
- Free plan available with limited features
- Paid plans start at $19.99/month (Starter)
- Higher tiers unlock multi-step Zaps and premium apps
However, costs can escalate quickly. For example, a single Zap with five steps counts as five tasks per trigger. If you have 1,000 triggers, that’s 5,000 tasks—potentially pushing you into a higher pricing tier.
Zapier vs Make – Zapier vs Make menjadi aspek penting yang dibahas di sini.
Make’s Fair Usage and Scenario-Based Pricing
Make’s pricing is based on the number of operations (similar to tasks) and scenarios (workflows) running. The free plan offers 1,000 operations/month and unlimited scenarios, which is more generous than Zapier’s free tier.
- Free plan includes advanced features like routers and filters
- Paid plans start at $9/month (Basic)
- Higher tiers offer increased operation limits and priority support
Make’s model is more predictable for complex workflows. Since operations are counted only when a scenario runs, and not per step, users get more value for intricate automations.
“I switched to Make and cut my automation costs by 60% while doing more.” — Operations Lead, E-commerce Brand
Zapier vs Make: Performance, Reliability, and Scalability
When automations run critical business processes, performance and reliability become non-negotiable. Let’s examine how Zapier vs Make stack up in real-world conditions.
Execution Speed and Latency
Zapier typically has faster trigger detection, often responding within seconds to new events. This is ideal for time-sensitive tasks like sending welcome emails or Slack notifications.
- Average trigger response: 15-30 seconds
- Real-time polling for most apps
- Occasional delays during peak loads
Make, on the other hand, may have slightly longer polling intervals (up to 15 minutes on free plans), but offers webhooks for instant triggering. Once a scenario runs, Make processes data in real-time with minimal latency.
Uptime and Reliability
Both platforms boast high uptime (over 99.5%), but Zapier has a longer track record and more transparent status reporting via its status page.
- Zapier provides detailed incident reports and SLAs on higher plans
- Make has experienced occasional outages but maintains strong reliability
- Both offer email and webhook-based failure notifications
For enterprise use, Zapier’s Business and Company plans include enhanced monitoring and support, making it a safer bet for mission-critical workflows.
Zapier vs Make: Use Cases and Ideal User Profiles
Understanding who each platform serves best is key in the Zapier vs Make decision. They’re not mutually exclusive, but each has a sweet spot.
Who Should Use Zapier?
Zapier is ideal for:
- Small businesses and solopreneurs
- Marketing and sales teams automating lead capture
- Non-technical users who need quick wins
Example use case: A real estate agent uses Zapier to automatically save new contact form submissions from their website to a CRM and send a follow-up email via Gmail—all without coding.
Who Should Use Make?
Make is better suited for:
- Technical teams and developers
- Companies with complex data pipelines
- Users who need custom logic and data transformation
Example use case: An e-commerce company uses Make to aggregate orders from multiple platforms, validate inventory, update shipping carriers, and generate daily reports—all in a single, dynamic scenario.
Is Zapier better than Make?
It depends on your needs. Zapier is better for simplicity and speed, especially for basic automations. Make is superior for complex, data-heavy workflows requiring advanced logic.
Can Make replace Zapier?
Yes, Make can replace Zapier for most use cases, especially if you’re willing to invest time in learning its interface. It offers greater flexibility and often better value for money.
Is Make free to use?
Yes, Make offers a free plan with 1,000 operations per month and unlimited scenarios. This is more generous than Zapier’s free tier, which limits you to 100 tasks and 5 Zaps.
Which is easier for beginners: Zapier or Make?
Zapier is easier for beginners due to its guided setup and simpler interface. Make has a steeper learning curve but rewards users with greater control.
Do Zapier and Make support custom code?
Yes, both support custom code. Zapier offers ‘Code by Zapier’ for Python and JavaScript. Make provides ‘HTTP’ and ‘Code’ modules for JavaScript, allowing deeper customization.
In the Zapier vs Make showdown, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Zapier wins on ease of use, breadth of integrations, and beginner-friendliness. Make dominates in flexibility, advanced logic, and cost efficiency for complex workflows. Your choice should align with your technical comfort, automation needs, and budget. Evaluate both with free plans before committing—your ideal tool depends on the journey you’re building, not just the destination.
Zapier vs Make – Zapier vs Make menjadi aspek penting yang dibahas di sini.
Further Reading:
